Friday, September 18, 2009

Underground Friday: Aradhna’s latest release Amrit Vani as good as Indian worship music gets

Originally here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/underground-friday-aradhnas-latest-release-amrit-vani-as-good-as-indian-worship-music-gets/


Amrit Vani cd cover

Amrit Vani cd cover

Since 2000, Aradhna has set out to create authentic Indian worship music.

By blending Indian bhajans (spirituals) with Biblical subject-matter, band members Chris Hale (lead vocals, sitar), Peter Hicks (acoustic guitar, sitar, English vocals), Fiona Hicks (Hindustani violin) and Travis Macafee (bass), have proven that good Christian music is not an oxymoron.

Amrit Vani (Immortal World) is the band’s latest release.

While listening, you can almost smell of Tibetan juniper incense, frying spices and rain-drenched soil wafting through the air as you lift up fragrant praise offerings to the Most High God.

Although this album in performed (mostly) in Hindi, the album’s lush, hypnotic grooves and the simplicity of the Gospel make you want to worship the Lord.

If you read the lyrics while listening to the music the (impact) is trebled. For those who don’t know Indian languages, the album’s liner notes are in English and Hindi.

Amrit Vani begins with Jaya Dev (Victory to God) and ends with Narahari (The Man-God).

Jaya Dev sets the tone for the album. The track begins with a low hum that blossoms into a rousing, yet exotic song of praise with table, guitar and a choir of angelic voices singing out “Jaya Deva Narahari” on the chorus. As it gets stuck in your head, don’t be surprised if Jaya Dev becomes your personal anthem.

Narahari is sort of a reprise of Jaya Dev. It wraps up the album nicely.

In between Jaya Dev and Narahari are eight sublime tracks dealing with various aspects of Christianity—from the suffering of the believer to the awesomeness of God’s creation.

  • Yeshu Raja (King Jesus) is a simple bhajan celebrating the incarnation. It’s sweet, sort of like a lullaby.
  • Amrit Vani gives praise to each person in the Trinity. It’s more up tempo than some of the other songs on the album. Expect someone to sample it for a rap song in the future.

  • Bhajo Re is a fun, call and response song that sounds like something you could sing with your mates at a sporting event, except it’s in Hindi and it’s about finding rest and peace in Jesus.
  • Dhyana Mulam is a short hymn of devotion to Aradhna’s guru-Jesus.
  • Man Mera is tender and gentle. Like the other songs on this album it’s in layers. It build up and builds up, finishing in a worshipful frenzy where Peter Hicks’ Peter Gabriel-esque vocals are striking when juxtaposed with the Hindi voices in the background.

  • Prem Milan (United in Love) is a folky travelling song. It is reminiscent of Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress in that it’s about a person who reaches his beloved after a long journey.
  • Prabhu Hamare- has Aradhna interpreting a portion of a song from one of the greatest songwriters, ever— King David, as the lyrics in this song are taken from a Hindi translation of Psalm 91, verse four.
  • Khat Khataao (Knock, Knock)—Christ’s words from Matthew 7: 7 set to music. Perfect.
  • Aayo Hai Aayo (A Nepali Christmas Song) recounts Jesus’ birth in a manger and His purpose for coming into the world—to become our Salvation. This might be one to add to the traditional Christmas rotation to mix things up.

From start to finish, Amrit Vani transforms its listeners, while transporting them to faraway lands.

For more info

For more information on Aradhna, visit www.aradhnamusic.com or www.myspace.com/aradhnamusic

Buy Amrit Vani at www.cdbaby.com/cd/aradhna2 or www.aradhnamusic.com/store.html.

See them live

Aradhna is currently on tour. Though they perform well in the studio, Aradhna is even better live, as their previous album, Satsang proves. Check out their schedule  on their Web site to see if they’ll be playing near you.
Quantcast

You are subscribed to email updates from The Underground
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Human Rights “Personhood” Amendment – extending rights to the unborn

Originally posted here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/human-rights-personhood-amendment-extending-rights-to-the-unborn/

protecting_the_unbornShould Human Rights, as defined today in America, extend to yet unborn babies? The American Life League says yes, and along with other pro-life organizations has announced its intent to propose a “Personhood” Human Rights Amendment to the Florida State Constitution.

A Press Conference was held Friday, September 11 at Florida’s State Capitol in Tallahassee to announce their intent. With pre-released media announcements, the group was already receiving criticism from pro-choice and abortion rights organizations.

The Amendment would recognize human rights for all human beings from the beginning of their biological development. Florida would be the first state to pass such an amendment. The Florida personhood movement recognizes unborn children as having the same inherent rights, dignity and value as every living human.

The proposed Amendment to the Florida Constitution reads in part as follows:
SECTION 28. Person Defined--
(a) The words "person" and "natural person" apply to all human beings, irrespective of age, race, health, function, condition of physical and/or mental dependency and/or disability, or method of reproduction, from the beginning of the biological development of that human being.

This connects with the Founding Fathers’ understanding of life as God created it:
As much as the colonists wanted to separate from Great Britain—and as much as American society today tries to obliterate the founding fathers’ faith in God— the words, faith and theories of English lawyer and judge Sir William Blackstone greatly influenced original American law.

Blackstone's “Commentaries on the Laws of England,” written circa 1765, was used to help shape the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. If our judges who presided over Roe v. Wade had gone back and read some of what Blackstone said on life, they would find these statements (italics and bolding are mine):

“Life is the immediate gift of God, a right inherent by nature in every individual; and it
begins in contemplation of law as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother’s womb
. For if a woman is quick with child, and by a potion, or otherwise killeth it in her womb; or if any one beat her, whereby the child dieth in her body, and she is delivered of a dead child; this, though not murder, was by the ancient law homicide or manslaughter…”

“An infant in ventre fa mere [in the mother’s womb] is supposed in law to be born for many purposes. It is capable of having a legacy, or a surrender of a copyhold estate made to it. It may have a guardian assigned to it; and it is enabled to have an estate limited to it’s use, and to take afterwards by such limitation, as if it were then actually born.”

Blackstone’s opinion was obviously formed with a Biblical basis, echoing a key Bible verses which commands respect for early human life:

Psalm 139:13: For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb.

FOR MORE INFORMATION on the Florida Personhood Amendment:
Personhood Florida: http://personhoodfl.com/
American Life League: http://all.org/personhood/, 540.659.4942.

This writer is not receiving remuneration or recognition of any kind from the organizations mentioned in this article.

See the writings of Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on The Laws of England, Book I, Of The Rights of Persons, Vol I. Section 1, originally written in 1765, reprinted Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1962.

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Pop Culture Moments by Mo: Obama’s Indoctrination of America’s Youths

Originally here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/pop-culture-moments-by-mo-obamas-indoctrination-of-americas-youths/


obama_indoctrination

President Obama’s speech to public school students on Tuesday caused an uproar among conservative parents. Prior to the speech’s delivery, many “conservative” parents accused the president of trying to indoctrinate their children with socialist ideas. Others said they were concerned because the speech had not been screened for political content.

There was even a  Student Walkout to Prayer (President Obama’s Live Address To Students), which more than 1,000 people attended, according to Facebook. (http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=128572170027)

When Obama gave his speech Tuesday, he urged students to work hard and stay in school.


Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Is the Church Caring for Senior Adults?

Syndicated from here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/is-the-church-caring-for-senior-adults/





Senior adults (age 65 and over) represent the fastest growing segment of America’s population. In Florida alone, a popular location for retirement, some county profiles show senior adults composing 24.5 percent of the residents.

According to a recent formula by the National Academy of Science (NAS), the poverty level among senior Americans may be nearly twice as high as previously thought under the still-used government formula from 1955. The old formula had measurements showing 10 percent of senior adults at the poverty level; the NAS measurement puts 18.6 percent of seniors at the poverty level.

Is the Church in general, as an institution, caring for its elderly population, or do we look at our senior members as “the nice old people who used to do all the work around here”? Moreover, are we concerned for the elderly in the area surrounding our church, even if they don’t attend?

Seniors May Hide Their Poverty- Even from Family and Church
Our seniors may hide their poverty—out of embarrassment, or they don’t want to worry anyone. Many depend on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid which don’t cover all costs, and they can’t afford supplemental insurance. More and more are retiring from jobs without pensions, or being laid off just short of receiving one. The money they thought was going to be there just isn’t.

Two years after my mother’s husband died, my sister and I discovered she was broke. The car had been repossessed, she’d been scammed by a magazine and book club for hundreds of dollars and her monthly expenses cost more than her social security checks. She was living on frozen and canned foods. They had resided in a different state, and although we went for visits, she’d kept this situation from us. She didn’t want to relocate.

Shocked into reality, I began researching and found that mom’s situation was typical. To make matters worse, if one must plan for the possibility of a Medicaid-approved nursing home which takes the person’s social security check as full monthly payment, many states require that a senior citizen has less than $2,000 to their name and be considered “destitute.” They must turn all other possessions over to family longer than three years before applying for a home of this type. Otherwise, they won’t qualify and will need to face an average monthly nursing or assisted living cost of $4,000-6,000 per month. Some families don’t save the gifted money to help with this expense. 

Sabrina, a local hairdresser, tells of an elderly widowed client: “Her property taxes had gone so high; she had to sell her home of forty years because it was taking two months’ worth of her social security.”

A senior couple whom I’ll call “Pete” and “Mary” finally admitted their plight to our church, asking: “Can the church help us pay some bills and give us some food? We are living on baloney sandwiches. It’s too expensive to eat healthy.”

Fortunately, the church had a food closet. But there were barely enough funds to pay the church’s monthly bills, let alone help its members.

Why are churches short on funds to help senior members, or senior adults in their neighborhoods? Author Arthur C. Brooks, in his book “Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth about Compassionate Conservativism,” discovered that churchgoers give more to charities than non-churchgoers. But these charities are mostly outside their churches.

A 2008 Barna poll on tithing shows the percentage of Christian adults who “tithe”–giving 10 percent or more of their earnings regularly to their church–averaged only 5 percent in 2007 (9 percent among those considering themselves “born again”). From 2000 to 2008, Barna reported the average overall percentage of churchgoers giving within their churches to be only 5 to 7 percent.

Here are some possible reasons:
-Some denominations now consider tithing to be “just an Old Testament concept” and have the laid back attitude “just give when you can” so as not to offend parishioners.

-Tithing isn’t being taught as good stewardship, part of Christian discipleship growth, or as a way to show your faithfulness to God. It has become an inconvenience.

-Misuse of church funds that hits national news makes people distrustful of their churches, so they give elsewhere.

The majority of churches in America are still small churches, and most small churches have depleted funds. They are often unable  to help with anything but a food closet, which they must depend on parishioners to keep stocked. And many small church parishioners are elderly. It’s a vicious circle.  

As Christians, we rely on Old Testament prophecies to prove who Jesus is; we still believe the stories of Moses, Abraham, David, Esther and Ruth; we still learn the lineage of kings. So how can we throw the Old Testament verses on tithing away? Especially Malachi 3:8-10 (NIV):

“Will a man rob God? Yet you rob me.
But you ask, ‘How do we rob you?’ In tithes and offerings…bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this,” says the LORD Almighty, “and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that you will not have room enough for it.”

The blessings in return may not be monetary, but there will be blessings. Or would we prefer to give everything like the Christians of Acts 2:42-47 in the New Testament? How many of us wouldn’t hesitate before bringing everything we own to be shared by a whole congregation?

James 1:27 says religion is simply taking care of orphans and widows in distress and keeping ourselves clean from the corruption of the world. Widows, widowers, elderly left alone – the Church must consider taking better care and being alert to the needs of the senior adults in our congregations.

Don’t wait to be asked. Do something nice for a senior citizen today.

You are subscribed to email updates from The Underground
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Interview with Pastor Jim Cessna

Originally posted here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/interview-with-pastor-jim-cessna/



partor_nigeria

Jim Cessna is definitely a man of God.

He has influenced many– myself included.

Though he has primarily ministered to people in the United States, his influence is felt as far away as Nigeria.

Bottom line: He brings salt and light to our dark world.

I got a chance to speak with Pastor Cessna recently.

I want to thank Mr. Cessna for this interview, please pray for him, that God would continue to use him, like he has for the past 30 years.

Check out our conversation below.

~James

JW: Can you tell me a little about you? Where did you grow up? What you like doing for fun? When did you get saved?

JC: I was born in Fairplay, Colo. during the depression. My family moved to Windsor, Colo. when I was two years old and to Boulder, Colo. when I was 12. I lived in Boulder until I finished high school.

JW: What you like doing for fun?

JC:I really like to fish and ski and hunt and just about everything else that involves the outdoors. I love to pray and spend as much time as possible with my wife and family.

JW: When did you get saved?

JC:I came to Christ in 1962 thanks to a loving group of people who love me with Christ’s love.

JW: What are some of your favorite bible verses?

JC: Favorite Bible verses: I’m always gripped by the Sermon on the Mount.

JW: What led you to become a pastor, or when did you feel by God to become a pastor/teacher?

JC: Early on I felt a call to the pastorate, but it took 12 years of growing a serving in the church before I went to Seminary. I became a pastor in 1974.

JW: Are you pastoring a church right now? If so, can you tell me a little about your church and your different ministries? What are some challenges leading a church or being a pastor? Also, what are some joys being a pastor?

JC: I am now retired, living in the same town where I was born. I serve as an elder in my church and give Spiritual Direction to 8 different people–one in Fairplay, one in Nigeria, and 6 in Denver/Boulder.

My greatest joy was as a missionary teaching in a seminary in Nigeria for three years. Other joys of the pastorate involve watching many parishioners grow in their relationship with Christ.

The challenges of being a pastor are mainly staying true to your calling and to the truth while trying to put out endless fires that seem to fester in many churches.

You are subscribed to email updates from The Underground
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Hubby Hubby: Why Ben & Jerry’s was wrong to take a stand on gay marriage


Ben & Jerry's renames Chubby Hubby
Hubby Hubby during September to celebrate
the legalization of gay marriage in Vermont.
 


Friday, as I was wrapping up my work week, I got an innocuous looking e-blast from Ben & Jerry’s.

I love Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, so I’m on their opt-in mailing list, Chunkmail.

It was entitled simply, “Introducing… Hubby Hubby.”
For some reason, the title did not make me pause.

I guess I was too busy thinking of pints of Ben & Jerry’s dancing in my head.

Intrigued, I scrolled down to read the message in the newsletter.
I read the brief paragraph that the message contained, and then I looked to my right.

I finally understood what “Hubby Hubby” meant: An ice cream confection celebrating the legalization of gay marriage in Vermont.

According to a press release, Ben & Jerry’s is renaming its well-known ice cream flavor Chubby Hubby to Hubby Hubby to raise awareness of the importance of marriage equality.

“Ben & Jerry’s has a long history of commitment to social justice, including gay rights. Its partnership with Freedom to Marry, a national leader in the movement for marriage equality, aims to raise awareness of the importance of marriage equality and to encourage other states to follow the blazing trails of Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, and Maine. Freedom to Marry promotes the national conversation about why marriage equality matters and brings together partner organizations into a larger whole – a shared civil rights campaign.”

The company will also serve Hubby Hubby sundaes in its Vermont ice cream shops throughout September.

To be honest, I was taken aback by it all. I really couldn’t believe that Ben & Jerry’s decided to take up the cause in this way.

I’m not sure why “Chubby Hubby” was chosen to be re-christened Hubby Hubby, but I’ll never be able to think of it in the same way.

Chubby Hubby contains fudge-covered, peanut butter-filled pretzel nuggets in a sea of fudge and peanut butter swirled vanilla ice cream.


For peanut butter and chocolate fans, this is a win-win flavor.

However, when paired with gay marriage, Chubby Hubby can seem unapetizing to some due to the sexual imagery the contents of the pints can elicit.

One blogger at Friction and Harmony wrote, "Silly activist advertising folks — you may as well call it what it is. In this new context, even the flavor description elicits a visual that’s so fittingly disturbing I won’t be able to pass the B&J section without throwing up a little…So I have to ask, what about the lesbians? Don’t they get a flavor too? Maybe call it something like “Strawberry Red Wings“?"

I know Ben & Jerry’s was just trying to be clever about things, but in all honesty, whether hetero or homosexual, I don't think people necessarily want to think about sex when eating ice cream.

While I don't agree with the way the blogger at Friction and Harmony made his point, I do understand what he's getting at.

If he is correct, then the imagery and description associated with the ice cream is actually offensive to homosexuals--many of whom who are trying to move people away from the idea that their sexuality is somehow abberant.

Then there’s the issue of actually commemorating a socially-charged cause like this.

How could a company even try to distill the struggle of a group of people into an ice cream flavor? A potentially offensive one at that?

As an African –American, my first thought was, “What’s next? Chocolate ice cream with black jelly beans to celebrate the Civil Rights Act of 1965 or to protest slavery in Darfur?”

I hate to say it but, this may go down in history as a blunder for Ben & Jerry’s, because the company really just told a large segment of its customers, that it doesn’t share their values.

Through countless referendums and, more importantly, their votes, people from all walks of life in the United States have shown that they are not for gay marriage. Some may be for civil unions, but they aren't ready for a radical redefinition of marriage.

To many in the United States, marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman. It’s as simple as that.

The problem with Ben & Jerry’s supporting this issue on the grounds of social injustice is that most people in the United States don’t believe that homosexual marriage is an issue of social justice.

While it seems as if homosexuals are being denied a fundamental right by not being allowed to marry someone of the same sex, most people don’t believe they are.

Depending on the side of the law that you are on, all laws are discriminatory in that they prevent someone from doing something.

One commenter on Issue Clash, a PBS discussion on gay marriage raised an interesting point with regards to this.

He said, “Personally, I don’t see how you can “change” the definition of marriage for homosexuals without changing it for any alternative group that wants to be married. In Islam, a man can “marry” four wives… and when three men want to “marry” nine women, what grounds will the state have to regulate them once the precedent has been set? Homosexuals call this a civil rights issue because marriage laws are (in their view) discriminatory.”

I understand companies having causes, but many people enjoy Ben & Jerry’s ice cream.

By choosing this highly controversial cause, stand by it Ben & Jerry’s may, the company is alienating part of its customer base to placate another segment. It's just not right... even if it is only for a month.

 

Leave a comment: What do you think about Ben& Jerry's stance on gay marriage?

Originally here: http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2009/09/hubby-hubby-why-ben-jerrys-was-wrong-to-take-a-stand-on-gay-marriage/

 

 

 

 

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

25 Year Old NIV Translation will be New Again

25 Year Old NIV Translation will be New Again

Posted: 07 Sep 2009 01:09 PM PDT


Revision Plans already Underway say Sources

The widely known and published New International Version of the Holy Bible will soon be undergoing a scholarly revision process for the first time in over 25 years, according to NIV copyright owner Biblica (formerly the International Bible Society).  As one of the most popular Bible translations of the 20th Century, the NIV has set the standard for countless subsequent translations and Biblical commentaries and is even included in dozens of PC Study Bible computer software programs. Its impact is one that exists on a global scale via print and digital media.

The popular NIV translation of the Bible is scheduled for a revision.

The popular NIV translation of the Bible is scheduled for a revision.

Evangelical book and Bible publishing giant Zondervan, along with the CBT (Committee on Bible Translations) have additionally announced their plans to completely cut all sales of the TNIV (Today’s New International Version) translation—a translation which several conservative Christians had qualms about during its debut nearly seven years ago. Apparently, controversy surrounding the use of “gender-neutral language” caused a stir among certain large sects of conservative believers (Source: The Christian Post). According to Biblica’s official website, the goal of the TNIV was to offer “clarity in contemporary English.” When referring to people, the TNIV employs the use of gender-inclusive language, but does not refer to God with such language.

Although the original NIV was first published and marketed to the general populace in 1978, it underwent a heavy revision process in 1984. Now again, in 2009, Biblical scholars and Greek/Hebrew translators plan to revisit the ancient texts in an attempt to remain faithful to their desire for contemporariness and cultural relevancy.

Members of the NIV revision team and the CBT have not yet released any official statements revealing how they plan to handle the controversial gender language issues that will no doubt arise over the coming months.

CBT Chairman Professor Douglas Moo told The Christian Post, “The new 2011 NIV is all about maintaining and enhancing the original values of the NIV for today’s readers.”

Together, the CBT and Biblica are certainly striving for one goal above all else: accuracy. Remaining true and faithful to the words and intentions of the original authors should indeed be the goal of any and every Bible translation. Biblica and Zondervan have officially announced that the new and revised NIV translation will be published in 2011, a year that will also mark the historic 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible.

You can read more about this new revision process of the NIV at Biblica’s official website: www.biblica.com. You can learn more about the products offered by Zondervan Publishing at their official website: www.zondervan.com.

You are subscribed to email updates from The Underground
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Posted via email from The Underground-- Not Your Average Christian Mag